Indigenous People and
Geographic Information Systems for micro level Forest Management
A case study in
Parambikulam Wildlife Sanctuary
Sekhar
L.K* and P. Pugazhendi I.F.S**
Corresponding Author: Sekhar
L.K, Email – sekhar_lk@hotmail.com
* Former Consultant (GIS), Parambikulam Wildlife
Sanctuary
** Divisional Forest Officer, Nilambur Forest
Division
Key Words:
Indigenous Knowledge, Indigenous People, Natives, GIS, Forest Management,
Streams, Seasonality and Tiger Distribution
Abstract
Parambikulam wildlife Sanctuary, located in the
oblivions of Anamalai hills, in Palakkad district of Kerala is highly traversed
by streams of the upper reaches of Chalakkudy River. Major part of the
sanctuary becomes dry for a period from December to May. An inventory of the seasonal
character of individual stream segments across a year can act as a knowledge
source for forest administrators in effective habitat management planning. It
is also equally important to know the distribution of critical species in the
sanctuary. The paper describes three separate attempts, all part of the 10 year
management plan preparation process carried out from the year 2001 to 2002
where in inputs from and efforts of indigenous people were used in preparing a
forest management planning database; first, it describes how indigenous people
and their knowledge on the seasonality of the streams were collected and
compiled into a GIS, second, how these communities helped in collecting
information and mapping tiger distribution in the sanctuary and third how the
assistance from indigenous people were utilized in collecting soil samples for
a scientific analysis. Such attempts incorporating indigenous communities in
scientific forest management planning will bridge the gap between bureaucracy
and local communities, thereby resulting in a harmonious forest management
scenario. Further, these datasets can act as inputs in scientific models that
require input parameters related to the seasonality of streams, for example,
mapping zones of varying soil moisture and erosion, as it was the case with the
present study. Present study was the humble attempt of a geographer and a
forest administrator in utilizing indigenous people and their local knowledge
as data sources in GIS for effective forest management. The attempt resulted in
a detailed GIS database containing the seasonality of the streams and also in
deriving a generalized map of the distribution of tigers in the sanctuary.
Introduction
Modern-day forest management paradigm considers Indigenous People (hereafter
IP) and Indigenous Knowledge (hereafter IK) they possess, to be important and
valuable inputs for forest management planning, database generation and even
decision making process, drastically diverting from erstwhile concept of
natives. The term Indigenous Knowledge was coined and first used by Brokensha,
Warren and Werner, in their 1980, edited volume Indigenous Knowledge Systems and Development. Their goal was to
find a term that “represented the dynamic contributions of any community to
problem solving, based on their own perceptions and conceptions, and the ways
that they identified, categorized and classified phenomena important to them”
(Warren 1996). Indigenous Knowledge, more recently has also come to be
recognized as “local knowledge that is unique to a given culture” (Flavier et
al. 1995). Sui and Waldron state “…IK should be treated as any other set of
data to be factored in to the scientific decision-making process”. Lawas and
Luning (1998), states, “There is a general agreement that the concepts
‘indigenous knowledge’ (IK), ‘traditional knowledge’, ‘local knowledge’,
‘community knowledge’ and ‘rural people knowledge’ are all terms for knowledge
belonging to grassroots people. Thus in a more unconstrained manner, indigenous
knowledge can be defined as the local knowledge processed by indigenous
communities about their milieu. Therefore, terms indigenous knowledge, local
knowledge and traditional knowledge are used throughout the article to refer to
the knowledge possessed by the traditional inhabitants of the sanctuary about
their surroundings. The Indigenous People (tribal) of Parambikulam are referred
though out the article as natives.
Geographic Information System (hereafter GIS), the most modern tool
available for a forest administrator enables a better quantification, storage
and retrieval of collected IK. More over, it enables to create, analyze and
process scenarios, using the stored data. GIS is simply defined as ‘a powerful
set of tools for collecting, storing, retrieving at will, transforming and
displaying spatial data from the real world’ (Burrough, 1986). It is a system
that acts as a platform for integrating information and ideas developed in many
disciplines including the field of geography, IK, forestry, surveying and
zoology, to name a few.
The utility of GIS and its inseparable relationship with IP and IK is
well explained by Pathak (1997); he states ‘Geographical Information System
(GIS) helps foresters meet the challenges of integrating bio-physical and
socio-economic information and drawing inferences regarding the complex
interaction between people and their environment… It (GIS) enables foresters to
incorporate the knowledge and participation of community members in planning,
managing and evaluating local forestry projects. This process helps link
community needs with project benefits’.
The article elaborates on three different instances in Parambikulam
Wildlife Sanctuary wherein local and useful information was collected from and
through IP and integrated into a forest management context through a GIS
database. The paper is an extract from the two year management plan preparation
process, spanning from 2001 to 2002, that included the preparation of the ten
(10) year management plan (Fourth Management Plan; 2002 – 2012), a customized
geographic information system, a website and a CD-Rom generaleria of the
sanctuary. These projects were funded under Kerala Forestry Project (KFP).
Relevance
Parambikulam
valley, which forms a major catchment of the Chalakkudy River, is to a great
extent, bestrewed by a large number of stream segments (Map 2.a, Table 1). Even
though a considerable number of stream segments are present, many of them are
not perennial. The seasonality status of each stream segment is of great
relevance to forest administrators. Decisions are to be made from time to time
regarding the civil works to be undertaken in areas requiring soil erosion
control, soil moisture conservation activities and also from time to time, meet
the fresh water requirements of wildlife by digging waterholes. Construction of
check dams and gully plugging, etc. requires a comprehensive database regarding
the seasonality characteristics of the streams. Further, such a database can
also serve as base data for many problems requiring spatial analysis. Maps
pertaining to such data sets and cross-tabulated results of such a database are
of great importance for a ten (10) year comprehensive management plan of any
wildlife sanctuary.
Tiger
monitoring, utilizing the pugmarks collected from impression pads is an ongoing
project for the last 5 years (Pugazhendi, 2002) under the tiger-monitoring cell
functioning in the sanctuary. The impression pads for pugmark collection were
laid at locations suggested by local communities. Sizable amount of data regarding
the number,
gender, size, age etc of the tigers that freely rove
the sanctuary are available. Tigers are highly territorial animals; individual
tiger claims a particular piece of land as his/her territory. There were only
vague ideas about the exact area that could be claimed as the territory of an
individual tiger in the sanctuary. The pattern of distribution of tigers within
the sanctuary was also a question that required an answer, as it can aid in
further deciding upon the locations of new impression pads. Further, such a
database can also aid in conducting tiger vise behavior studies, their food
habits and their response to different habitats.
Even
though there existed a general idea on the soil and soil characteristics of the
sanctuary, the ten-year comprehensive management plan demanded a much elaborate
database. Planning on restoration of natural habitat, particularly when the
requirement of artificial assistance is high, requires a comprehensive
knowledge about the Physico-Chemical characteristics of the soil. Habitat wise
information of the soil characteristics will enable forest administrators in
deciding the best species of saplings to be planted at a given area.
All
these efforts and even more were required to prepare a 10 year Management Plan
for the sanctuary. However, the available time and money for such a
comprehensive project was considerably limited compared to the efforts
required. A practical solution to accumulate and analyze as much data as
possible in a short period of 2 years with a given financial constrain had to
be worked out. The following efforts are a result of such a search for quick,
pragmatic and relevant information within the constrained situation of forest
management in the developing countries, especially in India.
Study Area
Parambikulam
Wildlife Sanctuary lies between the longitudes 76° 35' and 76° 50' East and
latitudes 10° 20' and 10° 26' North (Map 1). The sanctuary lies in the Chittur
taluk of Palakkad revenue district in the state of Kerala. Surrounding the
sanctuary are Pollachi and Valparai taluks of Coimbatore district in the state
of Tamil Nadu and Thrissur and Mukundapuram taluks of Thrissur district of
Kerala, India.
Lying in the southern part of
Western Ghats, immediately south of Palghat gap, Parambikulam Wildlife
Sanctuary, exhibits a mountainous terrain. The sanctuary lies between the
Anamalai hills and Nelliampathy hills. Altitude ranges between 300m and 1438m
above MSL. There are 7 major valleys and 3 major river systems. Geologically,
the sanctuary has hornblende biotite gnesis and charnockites. Major peaks in
the sanctuary are Karimala (1438m), Pandaravarai (1290m), Kuchimudi, Vengoli
(1120m) and Puliyarapadam (1010m). Apart from the natural rivers and streams,
the sanctuary possesses 3 man-made reserviors namely Parambikulam, Thunacadavu
and Peruvaripallam whose cumulative water spread is 20.66 sq. km.
Parambikulam Wildlife
Sanctuary is the most protected ecological piece of Anamalai sub unit of
Western Ghats. Surrounded on all sides by protected areas and sanctuaries of
Kerala and Tamil Nadu, The sanctuary is endowed with a variety of peninsular
flora and fauna, which are excellently conserved due to total protection and
minimal human interferences. The sanctuary is part of a major ecological continuum
from Peechi to Eravikulam through Anamalai, which aids the survival of large
viable populations of wildlife possible.
The sanctuary exhibits wet
tropical climate. Temperature varies from 15° C to 32° C. March is the hottest
month and January, the coolest month. Total rainfall varies between 1400mm and
2300mm. July is the wettest month and January, the driest. Sanctuary is blessed
with rain during both South West and North East monsoons.

Native People
Parambikulam
Wildlife Sanctuary is the home of 4 different indigenous communities viz.,
Kadar, Malasar, Muduvar and Malamalasar who are appreciably different in their
cultural, socio-economic and spatial organization. These four ethnic groups are
settled in six colonies. Another non-native human settlement is also there
known as P.A.P. colony, which came into existence in the 1950's and 1960's
during the construction of the three dams for Parambikulam-Aliyar Project,
which is an inter-state multipurpose project. The settlements are widely
distributed in the sanctuary, that each community in the sanctuary knows one or
the other part of the area in detail. The teams actively involved in the entire
set of projects were hand picked natives from every community and colony having
a good knowledge of some or the other part of the forest. It is relevant to
mention the anthropogenic groups that the natives of Parambikulam belong to.
·
Kadar otherwise known as
"Kadir" (Thurston, 1906) is the primitive inhabitant of Anamalai
hills. They are short statured, dark skinned and platyrhine (flat nosed). Their
original language is a mixture of Tamil and Malayalam. According to Thurston,
they are nomadic.
·
Malasar used to live in small
hamlets abutting the forest on the hills of Anamalai, Palakkad and Darapuram.
They speak a mixture of Tamil and Malayalam. Malasars are sturdier in build but
do not have the characteristic features of Hill men (Thurston, 1906). Malasars
traditionally were Non Wood Forest Products collectors and also used to work as
labours.
·
Muduva also known as
"Mudugar" are traditional cultivators living in the hills of
Anamalais and Idukki areas. They practiced slash and burn cultivation. They
speak a dialect closely related to Tamil with few Malayalam words. Thurston
found a mixture of West Coast and East Coast cultures in them.
·
Malamalasar are also known as
"Mahamalasar" and "Malaimalasar" as noted in the
Encyclopaedia of Indian Tribes (1989) and "Malamanushyar" (Susmita
and Sekhar, 2001). They are taller than Malasar, well built, dark brown and
have prominent nose and thin lips. They are generally nomadic who shift their
settlements frequently. They speak a dialect, officially named as ‘Malasir’.
Methodology
The
authors have tried preserving an innovative attitude towards the work right
from choosing the software to the way of executing the project. The software
that was used for the tasks was Spring 3.5 from Brazil's National Institute for
Space Research (INPE). Existing maps were scanned in A0 with the help of
Department of Geography, University of Madras. Raster images were then
registered using the registering module of the software and vector layers were
prepared. These layers were later exported to the ‘.tab’ file format of MapInfo
and were finalized. The files were further exported to ‘.shp’ format and
customized using Map Objects from ESRI.
Drainage
maps were prepared in section level (smallest administrative unit of a
sanctuary) accompanied by a table (Appendix 1) to be filled by the staff
(foresters and guards) as they were entrusted to visit individual stream
segments in the respective section, strictly along with natives. The department
staff had no liberty in inking the tables other than with those observations
made by the natives on the seasonality of the streams. Natives, mostly the
local tribes are very much aware of the water flow status of the streams (even
to the scale of First Order Streams) in the sanctuary. The table carried unique
identification codes for each stream and thirteen cells corresponding to each
stream pertaining to twelve (12) months and one extra, for collecting the water
flow status of each stream through out the year. The options to be filled in
the cells were, ‘yes and no’; if ‘yes’ water flows during that month, if ‘no’
water does not flow during that month. Based on the collected data, stream
segments of the sanctuary were classified into three, Perennial, Partially
Perennial and Non-Perennial. Streams that have water flow for more than 10
months were classified as perennial; those with water flow for a period of 6 to
10 months were classified as partially perennial and those with water flow for
less than 6 months, as non-perennial. The status thus derived was verified for
accuracy in some randomly chosen stream segments. Training was imparted to the
staff in the field identification of individual, mapped, stream segment.
However, staff had the discretion of choosing the most suitable native(s) for a
particular area. The whole exercise was to be carried out in a period of one
month; given the area to be covered and the terrain, it appeared to be an
insurmountable task but without inputs from indigenous people.
In
light of the compiled database from the tiger-monitoring cell, a team of tiger
monitoring staff, mostly natives, under the guidance of the Wildlife Assistant
(a department official) was sent for collecting the Lat/Long information of
impression pads using Global Positioning System (GPS) handsets. Measures were
taken to reduce the Estimated Position Error. Depending on the frequency of
visit to each impression pad by a particular tiger, pad location was assigned
to the animal that visited the site most. This enabled the researchers to
identify the territory of individual tigers and position each tiger by
determining the mean center of the impression pad locations that it visited the
most. This point was considered as a static location to refer to the particular
tiger for all practical purposes and especially for mapping the distribution.
The task had to be completed with a period of two weeks.
Teams
of natives were sent to previously chosen locations in every habitat type of
the sanctuary to collect soil samples. Locations were selected randomly but
care was taken so that every unique habitat type in the sanctuary is
represented. Training was imparted to them on the systematic collection of soil
samples using V-ditches. Collected samples where sent to Tamil Nadu Soil
Survery Laboratory, Coimbatore. The samples were analyzed for its
physico-chemical characteristics such as, pH, Electrical Conductivity, Organic
Carbon and Cation Exchange Capacity; physical characters like texture, maximum
water holding capacity, porosity, etc; and status of macro-nutrient (N, P and
K) and micro-nutrients (Zn, Cu, Mg and Fe). The effort has to be completed
within a period of one month.
Results and Discussion
The necessity of using Spring
3.5 was to remain independent of commercially supplied software. Governmental
departments in developing countries lack the necessary amount of money to be
continually depended on commercially supplied software. The experience in
developing countries as understood is that enough and more financial assistance
will be available during a project period, as and when the project is
completed, all the facilities put in place using expensive and commercially supplied
products will run redundant. The present effort was just an attempt to draw
attention towards which independent initiatives such as this can move. However,
there were crucial issues that could not be addressed using Spring due to lack
of work proficiency in it, which necessitated the use of commercially supplied
software in a later stage.
The
survey resulted in enormous quantity of data, which were coded into the vector
drainage layer of the sanctuary. The vector layer for drainage data was
prepared based on Strahler’s method of Stream Ordering (Map 2.a). This enabled
in issuing queries that resulted in cross-tabulating and summarizing the number
of streams in each order, number of streams in each order with a given
seasonality and so on (Table 1). Seasonality Map (Map 2.b) of the sanctuary was
prepared. The database served as one of the major parameters in analyzing and
preparing maps of the soil moisture conservation category areas and soil
erosion vulnerability classes (Map 3.a & b). The database served as the
primary parameter in identifying and delineating the wet and dry regions of the
sanctuary. These maps are pivotal for the further management and work planning
in the sanctuary and has been incorporated and widely used in the Fourth (4th)
Management Plan. The task would have been next to impossible to complete in the
short period of one month without local knowledge inputs on the seasonal
character of streams. Communities living in the respective sections had clear
knowledge of the seasonal characters of individual streams. The effort is quick
and pragmatic in the sense that in a strictly objective method of collecting
and compiling such a database it would have clearly required as much as a year
and efforts from a larger group of individuals to monitor the water flow
conditions in every minute stream segment of the sanctuary. Without the
assistance of the indigenous people it would not have been possible for the
department staff to reach exact locations of each stream depicted in the maps.
It must be noted that the if the indigenous people who assisted in the task had
sufficient writing and reading skills the task including filling up of the
forms could have entirely been assigned to them, unfortunate that they are not.
Thus this is a clear example of effective utilization of local knowledge
inherent in indigenous communities for deriving quality data for forest
management.
It
was identified that there is only one tiger that has its entire territory (Map
4.b) with in the sanctuary boundaries. The distribution of tigers (Map 4.a) is
more or less even. It was also understood from the exercise that there is only
one tiger, with the reference code T17, which has its entire territory within
the sanctuary boundaries. With these maps, it is possible for the effective
furthering of the activities of Tiger Monitoring Cell. Action planning for the
tiger-monitoring cell during the 4th Management Plan period is heavily depended
on these maps and database. Similar to the seasonality database generation
exercise, the task was also to be finished in a short period of 2 weeks. It
should also be noted that since the inception of tiger monitoring cell in the
sanctuary, it were the indigenous people who worked as staff members and were
paid a remuneration for their contributions. This approach of incorporating
indigenous communities in the main stream
Stream
Morphology
|
Stream Order |
||
|
Order |
No of Segments |
Length (Km) |
|
1st Order |
580 |
397.40 |
|
2nd Order |
146 |
106.60 |
|
3rd Order |
31 |
50.97 |
|
4th Order |
3 |
12.75 |
|
Unordered |
7 |
30.10 |
|
Canal |
1 |
2.97 |
|
Seasonality
Status |
||
|
Stream Type |
Total Flow
Length (Km) |
|
|
Perennial |
253.91 |
|
|
Partially Perennial |
228.10 |
|
|
Non-Perennial |
234.1 |
|
Table 1
management aspects of the sanctuary increase the
confidence of the communities and forest managers and thus bridging the gap
between bureaucracy and natives. Parambikulam Wildlife Sanctuary is one of the
very first to formalize such an initiative and the described task in a further
logical continuance of the same.
The
soil is found neutral in reaction in the dry deciduous forest and very strongly
acidic in montane grasslands, whereas, it is moderate to strongly acidic in
other forest types. EC is normal and organic carbon is high in all forest types
except for teak plantations where it is medium. The texture is clay to sandy
loam. Soils in all the forest types have moderate water holding capacity [see
4th Management Plan, PWS, Annexure V
(a and b)]. This
database was heavily relied on in preparing the Fourth (4th) Management Plan
period habitat and soil conservation strategies of the sanctuary. Hiring a team
of experts from outside the sanctuary would have incurred a heavy cost on the
plan preparation budget. So also, if it were not the natives who were assigned
to collect the samples they would not have found their way to the sites deep
inside the thickly vegetated forests without any modern navigation aid. Similar
to the other two tasks, the fieldwork component of the task also was to be
completed within a months’ time.
The
projects that were executed in Parambikulam Wildlife Sanctuary had great
contributions from Indigenous Communities, all through these years. Their
contributions are not limited to data collection alone; their local knowledge
had been utilized through out the preparation of the Fourth (4th) Management
Plan. The instances discussed above are those were in the information collected
through them and their local knowledge is integrated into a GIS environment. To
name a few other initiatives towards this end during the planning phase were,
design and preparation of micro plans for community development plans for each
native population, eco-tourism planning, eco-trek route selection and activity
selection, etc.
Indigenous
People are no more considered by the elite world as some idealized embodiment
of spiritual values or as some impediments in the process of modernization.
They are considered as people who cherish their own distinct culture, are
victims of the past and present day colonization and are determined to survive.
Sui and Waldron states, “Researchers, by overlooking the role of indigenous
knowledge (IK) have failed in sustaining the human-environment relationship…”
Many other authors have stressed the value of indigenous people and the
knowledge that they posses. However, indigenous knowledge has its own
limitations and is not a means to the end by itself.

Coupled with scientifically
organized knowledge, indigenous knowledge can be useful in almost all stages of
forest management. IUCN and the WCDE also stress that
the
sustainable management of natural resources can only be achieved by developing
a science based on the priorities of local people and creating a technological
base that includes both traditional and modern approaches to problem
solving. Combining indigenous knowledge
and scientific knowledge means, integrating information collected from
indigenous people with scientific information and technology. This necessarily
means that there are to be means devised to collect, store and process
indigenous knowledge in a similar manner as that of the scientific knowledge.
GIS with its capability to integrate information that originate from varied
sources, is the most suitable means achieve the same.




Conclusion
The study undoubtedly shows
that indigenous communities and the knowledge they posses are of great
relevance to forest management. GIS can be a single platform on which,
scientific knowledge and indigenous knowledge can be integrated. The projects
that were carried out in Parambikulam Wildlife Sanctuary over the past two (2)
years had indigenous community participation to a great extent. In the present
situation of ongoing unrests between indigenous communities and administrators,
across the world, and especially in Kerala, these projects and particularly the
exercises discussed are brilliant examples of exceptional harmony between both.
The authors appeal to follow this path, as it ensures community participation
and will add value to the opinions of indigenous, local communities as a whole
in a management, decision-making context.
Such attempts to involve
local communities in all possible aspects of forest management have to
increase. By ensuring indigenous community participation in forest management,
the administrators can ensure transparency, which is mandatory to modern day
administration. Indigenous Knowledge incorporated in management planning
ensures concord as it is to the interests of the local community. Further, GIS
acting as an integration platform will ensure that assess to stored information
is quick and effortless, retrieval and analysis is easier and thereby,
planning, decision making and management is fast and highly accurate.
References
Flavier, J.M. et.al, 1994. The Regional Programme for the Promotion of
Indigenous Knowledge in Asia; In D.M. Warren, L.J. Slikkerver and D. Brokensha
eds. The Cultural Dimension of Development: Indigenous Knowledge Systems.
Intermediate Technology Publications, London.
John,
D.W and Sui, D.Z 1998, Integrating Indigenous Knowledge and GIS in Landuse
Suitability Analysis. http//www.nuffic.nl/ciran/ikdm/4-1/articles
Lawas,
C.M and Luning, H.A, 1998, Farmer’s Knowledge and GIS.
http//www.nuffic.nl/ciran/ikdm/4-1/articles/lawas.html
P.Pugazhendi,
I.F.S., (2002). Fourth Management Plan for Parambikulam Wildlife Sanctuary: 2002
to 2012. Kerala Forest and Wildlife
Department.
Pathak,
P.K, 1997. Geographical Information Systems (GIS): Principles and Application
in Forestry. Indian Forester 123 (9): 801-805
Sekhar,
L.K. and Susmitha, C. (2001) GIS for Indigenous People management – A case
study on the Malamanushyar of Parambikulam Wildlife Sanctuary, Palakkad,
Kerala, with their physical and cultural fabric. MSc Thesis, Department of
Geography, University of Madras. Published in www.angelfire.com/indie/indigis
Thurston,
E. (1909) Caste and Tribe of Southern India. Madras.
Warren,
D.M. 1996, Comments on Article by Arun Agarwal. Indigenous Knowledge and
Development Monitor 4 (1). http//www.nuffic.nl/ciran/ikdm/4-1/articles
Appendix 1
Data Sheet Circulated to the Foresters for mapping
the perenniality of streams
|
Sl. No. |
Code Number |
Local Name |
Present Condition |
Months (Fill with Y or N) |
|||||||||||||
|
Full |
Partial |
Dry |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
|||
|
1 |
D.1 |
|
These columns are to be
filled by the researcher |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
2 |
A.109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
3 |
C.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
* Code strictly with the help of local people